Friday, February 3, 2012 10:54pm EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
"What if Peyton was fighting dogs instead of Mike Vick?/"
--Jadakiss ft. Nas, "What If," The Last Kiss, 2009.
"They say I'm all about murder-murder and kill-kill/ But what about Grindhouse and Kill Bill?/ What about Cheney and Halliburton?/ ... How's NaS the most violent person?/"
--Nas, "Sly Fox," Untitled, 2008.
"What if history was changed?/ Slavery reversed/ Would black ladies see white boys/ And clinch they purse?/"
--Fredro Starr, "What If," Firestarr, 2001.
Finally, Michael Dwayne Vick is free--well, not so. Stuck with an ankle
monitor, Vick is to spend two months of home confinement at his Virginia residence.
Last Wednesday, the former Atlanta Falcons quarterback was released from a
Leavenworth, Kansas, federal prison, after spending 19 months there for
allegedly running an illegal dogfighting ring.
Right on cue, the sports media is fired up and ready to go.
Weeks before his release date drew close, the pundit circuit had begun setting
parameters under which Vick could once again play the sport he was untouchable
at. To hear them tell it, he would have to make a public apology, televise
commercials warning against the dangers of dogfighting, beg for Roger Goodell's
(NFL commissioner) forgiveness, and make amends--financially--for his
wrongdoings. Among other things, he would have to join forces with People for
the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)--the same organization which recently
asked that he undergo "mental evaluation"--to emphasize regret about his past
conducts. Vick is being pressured to form alliance with this group, which
ruthlessly engages in crude advertisements, ostensibly to justify their love
for animals, such as dressing
up in Ku Klux Klan (KKK) garbs and accusing targets of attempts to create a
"master race" of pure bred dogs--which, they argue, shares similarities with the
KKK's values.Forbes
magazine National Editor, Michael Ozanian, captured this whirlwind of
self-satisfying rhetoric-fest last Saturday, in a column titled "Free Michael Vick." He wrote:
Vick has served his time under the law. He should not have to bend over backwards and do summersaults to prove anything to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell. Vick should not have to kiss the butt of the Humane Society or assist the animal rights group in any way. He should not have to "donate" any of his future earnings to any causes to repent. The law is the law. Vick broke it and paid the price. It is now time to completely free him.
It's important to note that Michael Vick spent 19 months
behind bars for a crime, inhumane as it was, more mainstream than the elite, gotcha media tried to make it out to be.
(And it ain't just Black folks doing it.)
The acerbic condemnation lashed out at Vick during the
beginning stages of his trial, proved that, for many, it had less to do with
Vick's alleged crimes against canines, and more with his function as a Black Quarterback
(an anomaly in the league). And not just any Black QB, but a fearless one--at
that. Before the prosecution could unravel all evidence sought in incriminating
Vick, most pundits had convinced themselves that not only was he guilty, but
jail time was due. The reason for this was explained by Black Philadelphia
Eagles Quarterback, Donovan McNabb, in a 2007 HBO documentary.
McNabb, no stranger to media-generated controversies,
himself, was more qualified than any other in his contention that Black
athletes, and Black Quarterbacks especially, bear burdens their White
counterparts are never subjected to. "There's not that many African-American Quarterbacks,
so we have to do a little bit extra," McNabb said. Using his career as a case
study, he continued: "Because the percentage of us playing this position, which
people didn't want us to play, is low... we do a little extra."
That extra he
spoke off, is what constitutes the stark racial disparity of coverage issued by
mainstream media and directed at Black athletes--more so, the non-conformist ones. Vick was one of
those--like T O--non-conformist. And for that, he paid a steep price. I'm not, by
any means, suggesting that Michael Vick or T O are progressive athletes with revolutionary
inclinations, but their firm commitment to on and off-field unregulated
self-expression, counts for much in the larger equation of Black professional athleticism.
I've always believed that the greatest sin a Black
professional athlete can commit, in the eyes of Major League Sports, is to
intimate--not necessarily state--that their career is not the most important
priority in life. Once that happens, the media is whipped-up and unleashed on
these personalities, and equipped with all weaponry needed to destroy, defame
and defeat that spirit which provoked such defiant conviction. If unsuccessful
in defeating the spirit, they usually
have no choice but to assassinate the characters themselves.
This has happened time and time again. Jackie Robinson, Jim
Brown, Muhammad Ali, Tommie Smith, John Carlos, Mike "Iron Mike" Tyson, Shareef
Abdur-Rahim, and Etan Thomas are but a few examples.
The threat posed by such intimation never misses the
detection of the three draconian-like commissioners: Roger Goodell (NFL), David
Stern (NBA), Bud Selig (MLB). Above all, Roger Goodell has been most competent
in taking Authoritarianism to unreached heights.
In Vick's case, it's hardly a secret that no other figure must
be more pleased with his appeal, than Mr. Goodell. Of course, as one only who
possesses the power to reinstate Vick, Goodell has made known--in indefinite
terms--what requirements are made of him: "Michael's going to have to
demonstrate to myself and the general public and to a lot of people, did he
learn anything from this experience? Does he regret what happened? Does he feel
that he can be a positive influence going forward?" At this statement, I'm
reminded of the old joke, coined by 19th century journalist, Charles
Anderson Dana: "Dog Bites Man: Not News. Man Bites Dog: News."
Any observant eye can see that Commissioner Goodell has been
anything but a "positive influence," in his role as CEO of the NFL. Taking any and
all opportunities to regulate the lives of players, Goodell's policies have had no
limit in absurdity and acidity. A succinct example of his sulfuric
sensibilities came through last year, during the media-made firestorm around former
Dallas Cowboy cornerback, Adam Jones, for a reported violation of "personal
conduct policy." Jones was suspended indefinitely, but not before Goodell could
humiliate him as innovatively as possible.
In an open letter to Jones, published for the world to see,
he wrote: "It's terribly disappointing to me that we're dealing with this again
and that he's reflecting so poorly on all of the players in this league, which
they don't deserve." Like a parent reprimanding a child, Goodell further
explained that Jones' actions had produced a "disturbing pattern of behavior,"
which was "clearly inconsistent with the
conditions I set for your continued participation in the NFL." [Emphasis
mine]
Goodell's remarks last week share a striking similarity to that
letter, and for good reason: Most Black men, like Michael Vick and Adam Jones,
are inherently smeared with the Hip-Hop
stereotype; a taint unlike any other in its destructive potentials and
demonizing possibilities.
The fact that men who look like Roger Goodell and David
Stern are more likely to be found as executives of record labels, bears no
invalidation upon this assertion. The fact that those who cling to this theory
are grossly unenlightened about the true essence of Hip-Hop culture and music,
couldn't matter less in the (money-making) discourses centered on (perceived) parallels
between Black masculinity and criminality. The fact that White athletes, like
Jadakiss and McNabb contended, are never subject to equally vitriolic
generalized representations, is meaningless to the Goodells and Sterns and
Seligs of this world.
In "Public Spaces, Private Lives: Beyond the Culture of Cynicism,"
acclaimed scholar, Dr. Henry Giroux, argues, quite convincingly, that these
representations and images are having far more impact than mass media--which
plays the largest role--is willing to acknowledge. He writes:
Fed by widespread stereotypical images of black youth as super predators and black culture as the culture of criminality, minority youth face not only a criminal justice system that harasses and humiliates them but also a larger society that increasingly undercuts their chances for a living wage, quality jobs, essentially social services, and decent schools.
The politics of punishment then becomes the last hope they have left, to bleach out thuggery--independence--from
the minds of Black athletes. The politics of punishment comes to represent a
salient, administrative weapon of mass destruction that renders mute the vocal
volumes of political courage Black athletes are illimitably capable of
mustering. The politics of punishment successfully keeps at bay the worries of
Goodell, Stern, and Selig, ensuring that their employees--potential forces for empowerment--are forever kept in check, and
reduced to factory-like workers, within the capitalistic system of professional
sports.
"And why you tryin' to slave us/
With minimum wages/
Slammin' my ni**as up in cages/
Changing their behaviors/"
--Onyx, "Last Dayz," All We Got Iz Us, 1995.
Tolu Olorunda is a columnist for BlackCommentator.com, and a contributor at TheDailyVoice.com.
-
NEWS UPDATES
- Marja Vongerichten Talks Kimchi Chronicles (0 comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
-
Barry Hundley commented on Kola Boof On Bin Laden's Death:
Can't hear that song without dancing.Drowning in middle-aged nostalgia here, as Soul Train was an e...
-
Scottie Brauning commented on MICHAEL JACKSON (1958-2009):
There's this black guy that's ALWAYS in the crowd at Rockefeller Plaza through the Today show. I tu...
-
Shirley Pomponio commented on CNN anchor Don Lemon comes out as gay:
When I was becoming an adult, Saturday didn't BEGIN until "Soul Train" came on the air! I don't kno...
-
Warren Mee commented on Why the Post cartoon is a big deal:
There's this black guy that's ALWAYS in the crowd at Rockefeller Plaza throughout the Today show. I...
-
Elliott Gutmann commented on A Short List of Things Black People Do Not Like:
Don, thanks for the effortless cool you taken to our lives. Go with God and strut down the Soul Tra...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2009-05-27 01:54:24
2009-05-27 08:41:20
It was so on point and timely that I am trying to figure out what I could possibly add.
2009-05-27 09:25:27
2009-05-27 10:53:01
2009-05-27 11:33:03
2009-05-27 11:33:46
2009-05-27 11:38:28
2009-05-27 11:58:07
2009-05-27 12:04:30
2009-05-27 12:10:39
2009-05-27 12:38:15
2009-05-27 13:12:01
2009-05-27 14:27:48
Ian What does PacMan's inarticulateness and affinity for strip clubs and Vick's crime have to do with Tolu's argument that Goodell, the man who heads the NFL, has attempted to drive the nail in coffins for both Vick and Jones, going beyond the restraint we would expect for someone in his position. Tolu states that Vick's crimes were inhumane so how does that equate to making an excuse for him?
Speaking about african-american men such as TO and Vick ONLY in negative terms is no different than what the best racist, sexist or homophobe does on a good day when they choose to talk about the same ONLY in negative terms. Tolu chose not to do that. He isn't writing about the perfect citizen. He isn't writing about a man convicted of mass murder at school in VA. It's about a man who killed some dogs and now has to endure more jail time outside of the penitentiary by PETA, Goodell, and unfortunately, his own people.
You Go Tolu!
2009-05-27 14:29:13
2009-05-27 15:03:50
2009-05-27 16:34:19
2009-05-27 16:51:00
2009-05-27 17:17:27
2009-05-27 17:17:57
The phrase "under the jail" should be reserved for those who commit acts against humans that are so egregious, extensive jail time is the only option. Back in December, I legally went out and used a Remington, aimed and shot a deer in the head (I was aiming for the shoulder). I'm a dog owner and cringe at what Vick did. But in the scheme of things?
under the jail? Nah!!!#8D38C9
2009-05-27 17:29:02
I ask out of interest because I never heard of those accusations you mention and I follow football. Where did you get this misinformation from? More importantly, you've concluded things about Vick that are just not true and are using them to lay the problems of the world of black men at his feet. That my friend, is the politics of punishment and is blatantly wrong and unfair.
2009-05-27 17:29:24
2009-05-27 17:39:47
2009-05-27 17:47:58
2009-05-27 18:21:19
2009-05-27 18:23:47
2009-05-27 19:03:04
2009-05-27 19:19:00
2009-05-27 19:44:07
I believe both shows poor judgment on his part by befriending such guys. However, there is nothing criminal or even allegedly criminal about having shady friends. I've had them. One or two have been to jail. Yet, no one has ever claimed that because of them, I now have had run-ins with the law which is what you did.
I hope you see that you are wrong on the facts surrounding Vick's run-ins with the law and wrong for judging him quite unfairly. No one ever insinuated his greatness.
2009-05-27 19:52:59
2009-05-28 08:44:21
2009-05-28 09:55:57
The way the blogs work is that someone posts an article. The author may participate but will often sit back and read how their thoughts have been received and discussed in an open forum. Tolu has no problem chiming in. He hasn't. That said, I am defending what I believe to be a good position Tolu has taken. If I didn't agree with him you would have issue with that too.
Ian, I'll conclude by stating that I am clearly less biased and judgmental than you are. If your friend (or assoc) committed a crime, I wouldn't consider you a criminal and most certainly not a thug. Your friends may be male whores, I would not conclude that you are. But hey, that's me. As I stated, I'm less judgmental. Vick's first run-in with the law is what he was jailed for. That's where his "run-ins" begin. Lastly (and respectfully) your weak-kneed approach to life is fascinating.
While Ray Carruth was involved in the murder of his girlfriend, became a figutive, was found hiding in the trunk of his car and is the reason his child now has downs syndrome or something like that--You consider a man who killed some dogs as the worst the league has ever seen. My friend, do you even follow football?
As with Ostend, telling. :)
2009-05-28 09:55:57
The way the blogs work is that someone posts an article. The author may participate but will often sit back and read how their thoughts have been received and discussed in an open forum. Tolu has no problem chiming in. He hasn't. That said, I am defending what I believe to be a good position Tolu has taken. If I didn't agree with him you would have issue with that too.
Ian, I'll conclude by stating that I am clearly less biased and judgmental than you are. If your friend (or assoc) committed a crime, I wouldn't consider you a criminal and most certainly not a thug. Your friends may be male whores, I would not conclude that you are. But hey, that's me. As I stated, I'm less judgmental. Vick's first run-in with the law is what he was jailed for. That's where his "run-ins" begin. Lastly (and respectfully) your weak-kneed approach to life is fascinating.
While Ray Carruth was involved in the murder of his girlfriend, became a figutive, was found hiding in the trunk of his car and is the reason his child now has downs syndrome or something like that--You consider a man who killed some dogs as the worst the league has ever seen. My friend, do you even follow football?
As with Ostend, telling. :)
2009-05-28 11:24:36
2009-05-28 13:27:50
There is only one way I interpret someone saying "As a dog owner, I cringe at [the thought of what Vick did]." How does that indicate my approval of animal cruelty? It doesn't.
You can delve in the psychology of why any of us do what we do. I have yet to hear someone approve of what Vick did. Never. I would prefer to go on the FACTS on which he was convicted NOT your interpretation of what should have happened. The assumption is that those who are jailed are able to reform themselves. Why are you advocating that ex-offenders should remain convicted in the eyes of the public? Jail time is enough. Why not allow a human to live his/her life without having them pay emotional retribution. To whom? Dogs? Come on my dude. You are being judgmental, bigoted, and utterly dishonest here.
The penal system enacted Vick's punishment. Holding him accountable is not your job but your choice. You have a cornered view of the world my friend. That is, you sit up high and judge anyone who has not lived the life free from error or bad associations or better yet, make different choices than you.
2009-05-28 14:45:28
2009-05-28 15:23:40
2009-05-28 15:51:34
2009-05-28 16:45:11
Grumpy, old and resentful.
Ian FYI the penal system, as I stated, enacts punishment, the courts absolve. Enjoy.
2009-05-28 19:59:39
2009-05-29 12:42:25
2009-05-29 15:34:16
2009-05-29 15:41:43
2009-05-29 17:27:32
Rowan, if you check my posts, I have been advocating the idea that criminals (especially those like Vick) should be allowed to reintegrate into society without having to continuously repay the society that shuns them. I have not pushed the notion that the opinions of others is irrelevant while using mafia like tactics. For that, I have been called out by people of your kind. Yet, I'm the one who is narrowminded? Call it what you will.
The slaughter of 10-even 20 dogs, on a continent spanning 4 million or so sq. miles, creates a HUGE ecological crisis? YEah ok, how was that recent flight aboard the concorde for you? :)
2009-05-31 07:31:58
2009-06-01 18:06:33
2009-06-01 18:14:57
2009-06-02 17:03:42
2011-10-08 07:03:56
2011-10-20 12:37:07
2012-01-02 17:11:45
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com