Saturday, February 4, 2012 12:16am EST
Make this your Home Page | RSS 
Black America Needs a Reality Check on Obama Presidency
Earl Ofari Hutchinson | Posted July 29, 2008 11:48 AMDuring the hard fought Democratic primaries between presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, black voters flatly said in exit polls that they backed Obama because he was black. But joy at getting the first African-American in the White House wasn't their only motive. They expect an Obama White House to fight hard for civil rights, affordable health care, quality education and job creation programs, and criminal justice reform. In a July New York Times poll Obama was rated far above Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson as the new go to guy on civil rights.
Obama is an African-American, a one time civil rights attorney and street organizer. He's been tagged a liberal Democrat. This further heightens black expectations that he will be more sensitive than Republican rival John McCain or past white presidents to the plight of blacks, especially the black poor. But Obama's presumed liberal voting record and activism on civil rights and poverty are things of the past. He had to change to win his fight for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Black voters make up about 12 percent of American voters. If Obama won every black vote in every state it wouldn't have insured him the Democratic nomination, let alone the White House. This has everything to do with the make-up of the Democratic Party. From the days of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the 1930s the Democratic Party has been a loose, unwieldy, and always fragile coalition party. The coalition traditionally has been made up of farmers, blue collar ethnics, blacks, Latinos, Jews, labor unions, and in recent years, liberal interest groups such as environmentalists, abortion and gay rights advocates.
The Democratic coalition badly unraveled in the 1968 presidential election. Republican presidential candidate Richard Nixon spotted an opening that election. He appealed to the Silent Majority of disaffected blue collar, urban white ethnic and conservative Jews who were outraged over so-called liberal permissiveness, the urban riots, antiwar protests, and Lyndon Johnson's pro big government Great Society programs. They deserted the Democrats in droves. A decade later the flight of white Democrats, especially white male Democrats, turned into a stampede to back Ronald Reagan. They bought his tout of strong defense, blast at tax and spend Democrats, and his downplay of civil rights.
To win the White House, Bill Clinton coaxed some Reagan Democrats to vote Democratic. To do it he had to drastically retool his approach. That meant casting the Democratic Party as a centrist even conservative party that championed strong defense, tax breaks for the suburban middle class, radical expansion of police power, revamp of welfare and downsizing government.
This Republican lite non-racial, centrist pitch did not threaten or alienate the white middle-class. Al Gore and John Kerry pretty much followed Clinton's script in their presidential bids in 2000 and 2004. They were virtually mute on issues such as racial profiling, affirmative action, housing and job discrimination, the racial disparities in prison sentencing, the HIV/AIDS epidemic, failing inner city schools, criminal justice system reform, and the shape of the Supreme Court.
Obama is at heart a centrist Democrat. During his stint in the Illinois state legislature at times he voted as a liberal Democrat on abortion rights, some criminal justice, civil liberties and environmental issues. At other times, there were nuances, compromises and caution in his position on these same issues. This drew raves from Republican legislators as a flexible politician and consensus builder who listened to the views of his Republican opponents. On the presidential campaign trail, Obama has been lambasted for flip flops on the Iraq War, tax cuts, FISA, abortion, gun control, and the death penalty. These are not so much flip flops as his repositioning as the centrist Democrat that he has always been.
In any case, civil rights and the ramp up in spending on education, housing and jobs, and health care programs have not been a priority for presidents in the past half century. Lyndon Johnson was the sole exception. That was only because of relentless pressure from the civil rights movement and the urban violence that tore America.
As president Obama will be no different. He will be pulled and tugged at by corporate and defense industry lobbyists, the oil, banking and nuclear power industry, government regulators, environmental watchdog groups, conservative family values groups, moderate and conservative GOP senators and House members, foreign diplomats and leaders. They all have their priorities and agendas and all will vie to get White House support for their pet legislation, or to kill or cripple legislation that threatens their interests.
An Obama White House will be a historic and symbolic first. But it will be a White House that keeps a firm, cautious and conciliatory eye on mid-American public opinion, and corporate and defense industry interests in making policy decisions and determining priorities. In that sense, an Obama presidency will be no different than that of other occupants of the White House, whether Republican or Democrat, and white.
Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst whose radio show, "The Hutchinson Report," can be heard weekly on KTYM Radio and blogtalkradio.com.
-
NEWS UPDATES
- Marja Vongerichten Talks Kimchi Chronicles (0 comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
- ( comments)
-
Barry Hundley commented on Kola Boof On Bin Laden's Death:
Can't hear that song without dancing.Drowning in middle-aged nostalgia here, as Soul Train was an e...
-
Scottie Brauning commented on MICHAEL JACKSON (1958-2009):
There's this black guy that's ALWAYS in the crowd at Rockefeller Plaza through the Today show. I tu...
-
Shirley Pomponio commented on CNN anchor Don Lemon comes out as gay:
When I was becoming an adult, Saturday didn't BEGIN until "Soul Train" came on the air! I don't kno...
-
Warren Mee commented on Why the Post cartoon is a big deal:
There's this black guy that's ALWAYS in the crowd at Rockefeller Plaza throughout the Today show. I...
-
Elliott Gutmann commented on A Short List of Things Black People Do Not Like:
Don, thanks for the effortless cool you taken to our lives. Go with God and strut down the Soul Tra...
Mark Allen
John Amaechi
Maya Angelou
Crystal McCrary Anthony
Patricia Arnold
Algernon Austin
Randall Bailey
Rick Blalock
Kola Boof
Keith Boykin
Mario Brossard
Michael Brown
Theresa Caldwell
Clay Cane
Jasmyne Cannick
Charisse Carney-Nunes
Audrey Chapman
Gordon Chambers
Staceyann Chin
Mark Corece
Gilda Daniels
Yvonne R. Davis
Terrance Dean
Marcia Dyson
Damon Evans
M. Franklin
Lenora Fulani
Ron Glover
Keli Goff
Peter Gomes
Deondray Gossett
Kia Gregory
Zulema Griffin
Malcolm Harris
Marc Lamont Hill
Alicia Hines
Dennis R. Holmes, M.D
Earl Ofari Hutchinson
Jessica Ingram-Bellamy
Jacqueline Jackson
Avis Jones-DeWeever
Quincy Lenear
Carl Lewis
Rae Lewis-Thornton
Shannon J. Love
Rod McCullom
Terry McMillan
M.W. Moore
Alphonso Morgan
Nicholas Nelson
Clarence Nero
Charles Ogletree
Spencer Overton
Shirley Parker
Deval Patrick
Charles Pugh
Anwar Robinson
Eugene S. Robinson
Rashad Robinson
Mark Sawyer
Tara Setmayer
Rev. William Sinkford
Alexander Smalls
Basil Smikle
Nadine Smith
Doug Spearman
John Stanley
Jamal Story
Ronald Sullivan
David Dante Troutt
Omar Tyree
Linda Villarosa
Dorian Warren
Isaiah Washington
Robin Washington
Diane Weathers
Reg Weaver
Marcia J. Williams
Nathan Hale Williams
Jeff Winbush
Kai Wright



MySpace
flickr
YouTube

2008-07-29 12:01:53
2008-07-29 12:08:43
2008-07-29 12:18:01
2008-07-29 12:57:52
2008-07-29 16:14:01
2008-07-29 17:04:44
2008-07-29 18:31:29
2008-07-29 19:08:56
2008-07-29 23:24:04
2008-07-30 03:45:53
There is no doubt about it
Mr Earl Ofari Hutchinson we have a jealousy problem
Listening to your point. Well what is the point? Because it just sounds like jib-jab and it's very strange that alot of Blacks in the public eye that is older than Bracak refuse to give him his props....why is that?
And if there are some Blacks voting for him due to him being partially African American...SO DAMN WHAT! Why not be proud I know I am
White folks to do it everyday. But I'm sure BlkBandit and Justin who posted negativity on here don't see it that way. POOR THEM. You do have an alternative and that is John McCain
The mentality of some people is SAD AND PATHETIC
But you're definitely giving some of White America what they want to see
A DIVIDE AND CONQUER STRATEGY
And this time WE'RE NOT HAVING IT!
YES WE CAN AND WE WILL!
2008-07-30 11:00:58
2008-07-30 11:11:56
2008-07-30 11:14:00
Maybe we should just turn in the towel, go back into the fields and hope to one day be freed
2008-07-30 12:28:32
2008-07-30 12:35:02
2008-07-30 14:46:20
2008-07-30 15:05:23
2008-07-30 15:33:21
It was McCain who peddled the story that Obama is an elitist. It was McCain who did the same about Obama's bitter comments. It is McCain who accuses Obama of causing gas to rise. It is McCain who now accuses Obama of wanting to lose a war rather a campaign. It is McCain who didn't support Bush's tax cuts (now he does). It is McCain who didn't support off-shore oil drilling (now he does). It is McCain who called Jerry (gays and lesbians are responsible for 9/11) Falwell an agent of intolerance, but then sought his vote. It is McCain who sought the support of John (catholic church the great whore) Hagee and refused to denounce him even AFTER the comments were made public. It is McCain who voted for the war. It is McCain who refused to support making MLK's b-day a federal holiday. Waterboarding, detainee detentions, GI Bill, abortion, confederate flag, and most of all, the idea that Obama is a Muslim
Now you can have whatever opinion of both Obama and McCain you see fit. However, being a POW is not presidential, it is noble. So before you implore african americans to learn a little about Obama, you may want to learn about the new McCain. If, (after his outstanding record of achievement mostly during his 1/4 century tenure in the US Senate), the only thing you can point to is being a POW 40 years ago and campaign finance reform, then it gives us readers insight to what you consider presidential and we can take that advice lightheartedly.2008-07-30 17:32:43
2008-07-30 17:44:19
2008-07-30 18:31:44
2008-07-30 19:11:28
2008-07-30 19:13:51
2008-07-30 19:17:09
2008-07-30 21:03:47
2008-07-31 08:07:43
And blkbandit if you really think Nader means what he says when he talks about stopping payday loans, etc WAKE UP. He is pandering and trying to find a way to stop Blacks from voting for Obama such as yourself
In all of his other attempts I never heard Nader talk about Blacks before and NOW he does...YEAH DAMN RIGHT. He doesn't care just like the rest of them and if that be the case I have to pick the lesser of 3 evils and it's NOT SHADY NADER, OR MCSHAME
YES WE CAN, AND YES WE WILL
2008-07-31 09:10:01
2008-07-31 15:57:05
2008-07-31 17:38:52
2008-08-01 12:15:00
2008-08-01 12:38:41
2008-08-02 17:26:32
2008-08-02 18:09:29
2008-08-04 16:33:45
2008-08-05 11:14:47
If it was true you would not be interested in political commentary yourself. If it was true, George Bush would not have had the opportunity to fu**ck up the world's economy and relations as America has let him do it over the past 8 years. It matters WHO is in power. And it matters a whole lot more to those most negatively affected even if marginally by the current status quo.
Like MidwestGuy says: if it did not matter as you want to make us believe then black americans may as well go back to the fields. It is true that Obama will not bring about revolutionary change during his tenure, for instance a reversal of racism and against white america. But a change even at the magnitude of reversing to the opposite direction Goerge Bush's costly achievements is much more than significant at a national and international level. I am sure and you know it as well that Obama will bring more change than that in those terms.If you are a student of history, you'd also know that there are events which often act as catalysts to new historical projectories and this is well one of them. Even long after Obama has left the whitehouse, change in his name would still be forthcoming. You seem to want to underplay the eternal power of iconic perception that will come with an Obama face in office and the ripple multiplier effects of such an event to rest of society's self imagery - at present and in future.
As a sociologist, which I think you have been a good one in your career, it is a pity that here you are willing to be driven to an impoverished academic space just so that you can make an ideologically loaded argument against someone you did not favour at the start of this presidential campaign. I doubt you'd have been this sweatily motivated if Clinton had won. It is disingenuous of you to coat your statements and arguments with a well polished and serious sounding jargon acquired from your historical practice, when at their core, you know they are false. But even more criminal is to use cunningly that sophistication and biased historical data to steal hope away from your fellow human beings. Because basically you have said that Obama's presidency will be as meaningless as any other presidency in recent history - while you know that will be a lie. And while you know that social meaning is not merely confined to figures used in reference to GDP rates, incomes, HiV infection rates, global oil prices, job losses, and the rest - all measured within a single term of presidential office.Jesus Christ died more 2000 years ago. And we continue to live with his legacy - whether we like it or not
2008-08-05 17:27:17
2008-08-05 19:07:04
2008-08-06 23:01:49
2008-08-07 14:36:10
To see your comment, wait approximately two minutes, then simply refresh the page.
Report issues/abuses to suggestions@thedailyvoice.com